Archive for July, 2004

corps picking up dnc tab

When the speeches are finished, the applause is over and the balloons are dropped, what’s a DNC delegate meant to do? Party with the Corporations, of course.

This great article at AlterNet takes a look at the late-night corporately-funded shin-digs happening across Boston.  Dangerous multinationals Generous corporate citizens like Pfizer, Bristol Meyers and Altria (the company formerly known as Philip Morris) are ponying up to the bar and buying drinks, food and politicians one shrimp-stuffed canape at a time.

The article is written by Micah L. Sifry and Nancy Watzman, authors of the superbly titled book: Is That a Politician in Your Pocket? Washington on $2 Million a Day. The problem with corporately funded fetes, they argue, isn’t who gets to sip champagne with delegates, it’s who is not on the guest list:

What happens at these parties isn’t so much the direct exchange of cash for favors as something more subtle and invidious: the reinforcement of a common worldview. That’s because ordinary people aren’t invited to these events; nor could they afford to pay-to-play. So the politicians in the room don’t hear about the high cost of health insurance or how hard it is to find affordable housing on the minimum wage. To do that, they’d have to talk to the waiters, busboys and janitors who clean up after the revelers leave at 2:00 a.m.

When November 3rd rolls around, I’m hoping for a change in Washington, but I’m not naive enough to believe much will be different. You are who you party with. And it’s clear that many of the regulars will be sticking around the trough regardless of who takes the White House. 

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said:

bayer’s sneaky blog-reader

My web stats are definitely back to normal, after Monday’s jump. I don’t mean to harp on about my traffic, but another surprise was waiting for me this morning when I checked out my Nedstat counter. This time, it’s not how many people are dropping by, it’s who is dropping by:

It looks like someone at Bayer has picked up on my recent post about Aspirin’s misleading carpal tunnel syndrome ad.

Sitemeter reports that they stuck around for about six minutes then took off. Just long enough to read my post and  . . . .who knows? Pass my post onto their boss? Call Interpol? Only my sitemeter knows and I’ll keep checking it throughout the day. 

If I don’t post again in 24 hours, you can assume the Bayer police got me. Or my CTS is flaring up again. 

Related Link:  For a great look at how PR and marketers are fearful of the power of blogs, check out Chandrasutra’s great post on the subject.

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said:

breaking the 100 barrier

blasting the 100 barrier with a bullet!

Things were busy around here yesterday. For the first time since starting this weblog, I cracked the 100 visitors mark. It was all due to ConsumerWorld.org linking to my recent post about Aspirin’s misleading CTS commercial.

ConsumerWorld.org is run by consumer lawyer Edgar Dworsky, author of several consumer protection laws and the former Massachusetts Assistant Attorney General. The site serves as a one-stop-shop for the latest consumer warnings and sources for bargains for shoppers. It was my first time there, but from the numbers he drove to my site, it’s clear he has a large readership.

I will say that I was disappointed that out of 124 visitors, not one left a comment! I had to rely on my regular core group of readers for any kind of debate or insight. Thanks to them for their comments.

My numbers are back down to realistic levels and that’s fine with me. I’m not in this blogging thing for the fame or glory. I enjoyed my brief rise to the heights of three-digit visitors but I’m happy to be back on earth and content to be a Personal Blogger in the Fractal Blogosphere.

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said:

liking linda



“The next day, February 15, more than 10 million people took part in protests worldwide. Without access to intelligence data, with nothing more than their own questioning minds, millions of ordinary people had figured out what journalists had been unable or unwilling to see ? that there were glaring flaws in the U.S. case for war.”
– Linda McQuaig, rabble.ca

I’m always late to the party, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that I’m just discovering Linda McQuaig. It should also be no surprise that I like what I read and hear from her.

The short piece quoted above first appeared in the Toronto Star, but was re-printed at Rabble.ca, last Monday. It’s a critique of the media’s pathetic mea culpa in the wake of the ‘faulty intelligence’ alibi put forth by the US government a few weeks ago.

In the run up to the Iraq war as everyone, except the United States government, pleaded for more time in the search for WMD, the big networks of US media, from CBS to CNN, acted like White House stenographers instead of investigative journalists. It was appalling and ironic to see Wolf Blitzer on the Daily Show last week claiming that the media should have “been more skeptical.” I echo McQuaig’s response: “What do you mean ?we,? white man?”

Mainstream media’s late acknowledgement is just one more reason to turn off the TV and tune into other forms of less-filtered media. But that’s old news, we’ve had a few other apalling reports come out from the US to deal with.

McQuaig is a regular columnist for the Toronto Star newspaper and the authour of a new book It’s the Crude, Dude (out this September from RandomHouse Canada.) Her book discusses the US’s ever-changing reasons for the invasion of Iraq and lays out the real reasons behind the war: oil.

I had the chance to hear McQuaig speak about her book during last month’s Book Expo Canada. It was one of those stupid lunch talks, where the poor speakers (in this case David Suzuki, Michael Harcourt and McQuaig) have to struggle to be heard over clanking cultery and shouting waiters. My media pass didn’t buy me the lunch, so I hovered in the back of the room and watched.

It was a pleasure to see the book store owners, publishing executives and aspiring authours stop chewing and start listening to McQuaig as she linked the US’s thirst for oil with the current war and occupation of Iraq. To me, all this was completely obvious and old news. I (and millions of others) had been shouting this at our TVs and in rallies around the world for the last year. But the way McQuaig relentlessly brought up the facts of history and tied them to corporate connections of today made me feel like I was hearing it for the first time. It was great to hear these truths spoken outside of my regular news sources and away from the protest marches. It was even better to see Suzuki and Harcourt nod as McQuaig spoke. I bet they yelled at their TVs too.

Like her articles in the Star and in Rabble, McQuaig’s book isn’t blowing the lid of any dark secrets. She admits that her book is aimed at those people who still think Bush & Co really were looking for WMD/Liberating Iraq/Going After Saddam/Invaded Under Faulty Intelligence (or whatever the latest war excuse is currently being peddled.)

The good thing about McQuag is that she doesn’t preach to the converted. She writes to convert and is still operating below the radar of the right. Michael Moore can’t take a dump without the right accusing him of being biased (as if this is something new in the media.) McQuaig’s books and articles can be passed on to friends, relatives or colleagues who may have swallowed a few too many CNN stories. And because she hasn’t been vilified by conservatives, her work doesn’t come with the media baggage that unfortunately puts off the undecided and unthinking when they see anything with Moore’s name attached to it (“I hear he’s really biased.”, “He’s got an agenda.” and all that crap.)

If you haven’t already, check out her semi-regular articles every Monday on rabble.ca. I’d love to hear what you think.

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said:

canadians re-defeating bush

Q: What’s the best thing about being an American citizen?

A: You get the chance to re-defeat of George W.

But now even Canadians can have their say.

Georgebush.ca is an online petition that aims to get 1 million Canadian signatures telling their friends to the south to give the current president the heave-ho. Who the hell are we to stick our noses into a foreign election? They got that covered in their handy Q&A:



Q: What business do Canadians have interfering in another countries democratic election?

A: The foreign policy of any United States government directly impacts the rest of the world. US voters have the right to know how their northern neighbour, and ally, feels about the current administration’s policies.

So, head over there and vote!

If you’re having doubts, I’ve got my own handy Q&A that will ease your conscience:

Q: Will it make a difference?

A: Probably not. 

Q: Will it get us sued by a freakzo right-wing yankee ‘grassroots’ group for messing with their elections?

A: Hopefully.

Q: Does it feel good to pretend to vote against Bush?

A: Hell, yeah!

[Thanks to James McNally at GTABloggers]

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said:

heart and soul officially sucks

“Almost four weeks after its July 2 release on 98 screens, America’s Heart and Soul has taken $311,572. This week it was showing on just 13 screens in the entire US mainland.”

- Guardian Unlimited

Disney’s flag waving, stomach-churning ode to apple pie and yankee doodle dandy, America’s Heart and Soul has been dying a quiet death for the past month and this piece in the Guardian explains why. 

Note to Disney execs: When the biggest claim that you can make about your film film is that it features a new song by John Mellencamp, you know it sucks. 

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said:

aspirin’s misleading message

Bayer, the makers of Aspirin, desperate for more market share, are now branding their headache drug as a cure-all for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Last night, during the National on CBC, I saw a completely irresponsible commercial for Extra Strength Aspirin, which claims that their little pills are the answer for people suffering from CTS.

For those who haven’t seen the ad, it shows a woman typing in an office who must stop typing because of the pain in her wrists. To show the pain, flames shoot from the underside of her wrists. A co-worker approaches her and inquires whether or not the woman is taking a break. When the woman complains about her wrist pain, the co-worker suggests she take Aspirin and get back to work. At the end of the commercial, the woman has taken the Aspirin, no longer suffers from the burning pain and continues typing in an non-ergonomic and damaging way.

Like many computer users, I suffer from CTS and must monitor my time in front of the computer very carefully. The solution to CTS is not a drug that merely masks the pain, but prevention through ergonomic keyboards, mouse pads and a proper computer set-up. Bayer’s ad is just another example of drug companies pushing medication over prevention.

I’ve already written a letter to Bayer, complaining about the commercial and sent it to them via their corporate site. The letter is below. Feel free to copy it, alter it and send it to them as a signal that you won’t stand for their careless and irresponsible marketing. You can submit the letter to this page:

http://www.bayer.ca/display.cfm?Object_ID=66&feedbackArticle_ID=5>

Open letter of complaint to Bayer Canada:

******

Bayer Canada,

As a journalist and sufferer of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), I find your new advertising campaign for Extra Strength Aspirin offensive, insensitive and incredibly irresponsible.

The commercial I am referring to is currently being broadcast on the CBC during the National news program. It shows a woman typing in an office who must stop typing because of the pain in her wrists. To show the pain, flames shoot from the underside of her wrists. A co-worker approaches her and inquires whether or not the woman is taking a break. When the woman complains of her wrist pain, the co-worker suggests she take Aspirin and get back to work. At the end of the commercial, the woman has taken the Aspirin, no longer suffers from the burning pain and continues typing in an non-ergonomic and damaging way.

It is clear from the incorrect way the woman is typing, the non-ergonomic keyboard she is using and from the location of her pain that she is suffering from the early stages of carpal tunnel syndrome. As she continues to type she is doing serious damage to her bones and nervous system.

The advice of the co-worker (and Bayer) to take some Aspirin and keep working is incorrect, insensitive and very dangerous. It misleads those suffering from this debilitating condition into thinking that after they pop a little pill the problem is solved and they can keep on working without fear of doing more damage. This is completely wrong. The Arthritis Society of Canada has this to say about pain relieving drugs and CTS:

“Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs – pronounced en-seds) are a type of medication that helps reduce the pain and swelling of the joints and decrease stiffness. However, they do not prevent further joint damage.”

Link: http://www.arthritis.ca/types%20of%20arthritis/carpal/default.asp?s=1>

The woman typing may not feel the pain anymore, thanks to your drug, but she is still damaging her joints and will only worsen her condition. If she carries on like this for another few weeks, the CTS will further damage her ligaments and tendons and the Aspirin will no longer be enough to stop the pain. She will no longer be able to work, not to mention type. This is essential information that affects the decision of the pain sufferers to use your product and nowhere in your commercial is this information addressed. This is misleading and irresponsible and it must stop.

For these reasons, I am calling for Bayer Canada to immediately pull these dangerous commercials from all television stations. At the very least, a clear message should be inserted into the commercial telling viewers that the woman suffering from CTS needs to take a break from working, see a doctor and improve her working conditions via an ergonomic keyboard, mouse pad and suitable office furniture.

As long as that commercial appears on television I will not buy nor use any Bayer products. I will advise my friends, colleagues and readers to boycott any and all Bayer products until these commercials have been removed or adjusted with a clearer message about the dangerous of CTS.

In addition to sending this letter to you, I am also sending it to the CBC, the Arthritis Society of Canada, The College of Family Physicians of Canada, and posting it on my weblog http://www.liamodonnell.com/feed/>. With this letter and the truth circulating the Internet, a different story about Bayer and CTS can be told. A story that will change the way consumers look at the Bayer brand and hopefully change the irresponsible methods employed to sell your product.

 

I look forward to your prompt reply and response to this matter.

Sincerely,

Liam O’Donnell

http://www.liamodonnell.com

odonnellliam@hotmail.com

*******

In addition to this letter, check out what these other bloggers are saying about Bayer’s misleading commercial:

 

Mel at Chandrasutra: “Irresponsible advertising alert”

Matt at Everything is In/Flux: “Tunneling through the lies”

 

Anyone else seen this commercial, suffering from CTS or talking about this on their blogs? Comments and trackbacks welcome.

 

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said:

ratboy writes good

Tony Walsh (aka Ratboy, Zero Grace and the evil genius behind ClickableCulture) has a great new article on MindjackMultiplayer Gaming’s Quiet Revolution details the evolution of the expression of emotions in online environments, from text-based emoticons to user-created 3D graphic emotions for MMORPGs like Second Life

 

I had the pleasure of editing the article, which was very timely as I’m re-reading Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson. In 1992, Snow Crash predicted many of the developments that are currently happening in online worlds and that Tony talks about, namely the importance of displaying emotions by a user’s avatar

 

Anyone who is interested in online worlds that go beyond the Everquest model of swords and sorcery should check out Tony’s Mindjack article and his Second Life Journal.

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said:

paul gipe says what

toronto's wind turbine

Paul Gipe speaks about wind power tomorrow (Tuesday July 20th) at Toronto’s C’est What pub. Paul is an author and advocate for the power of wind energy and his Wind Works site is a great resource. His talk is part of a Speakers Series, organised by the Community Bicycle Network of Toronto.

 

One of the topics Gipe will hopefully speak to is the affordability and effectiveness of wind turbines. I’m very proud of WindShare’s turbine down at Exhibition Place, here in Toronto, but there have been many questions about whether it (and other turbines) generate enough power to be economically feasible and if they make too much noise.

 

I’m still very partial to the distributed power model of energy generation, as seen in the roof top turbines I blogged about a few weeks ago. 

 

If everyone had a responsibilty (or incentive) to generate their own power through environmentally positive ways, then we’d finally recognise the true value of energy. People would start to see the energy they use as being something tangible that must be generated and that doesn’t simply come from the wall like magic. Only then will the idea of conservation really start to take over. If generating and maintaining even a portion of household’s energy were put in the hands of the home owner (or renter), then it would be placed on par with keeping the fridge stocked with food. It would become ‘normal’, acceptable and routine to think about conserving and maitaining a healthy stock of energy, so that your family isn’t left without power.

 

And speaking of renters, I’m eager to see if Paul Gipe has any suggestions for people who don’t own their own homes but are interested in generating their own energy. Is it possible? What are the landlord/tenant issues? If renters can get a communications company to put a satellite dish on their roof, then why not a wind turbine too?

 

I’m looking forward to Gipe’s talk, if you’re in town and interested then drop by. The talk starts at 6 pm (more details) at C’est What down on Front Street.

 

See you there.  

No tag for this post.

posts that might have something to do with what I just said: